« Home Again |
| A Poem about Rain »
If you'd like to read something nice about me, click here.
If you'd like to read something indifferent/bordering on hostile about me, click here.
Posted by michael ian black on October 18, 2007 in Press
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54edada5e883300e54f0e93508834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Little Positive Press:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Regarding the second link--that was not journalism. I'm surprised the reporter's editors published that, bizarre editorializing and all. His hurt feelings shouldn't have entered into the story.
Valentina Tapia |
October 18, 2007 at 06:08 PM
The first interview is a fun, fast, snippitysnappity back and forth. It makes me want to dip oreos in milk, ooze the mess through my teeth, and giggle like a kid.
The second interview smells like Madonnas pee. It could have been conducted by an open wound. This guy needs a pot full of Prozac, a unicorn bong, and to RE-fucking-LAX.
October 18, 2007 at 06:37 PM
First interview: Best quality Black. Furthermore, are you talking about the VH1 show "Best Week Ever"?? Because I am a dedicated fan of this show, and if you are somehow involved in said show, I would love for you to elaborate on this!!
Second interview: Garbage.
October 18, 2007 at 07:18 PM
By "Best Week Ever", do they mean "I Love the 80s"? Because, unless I'm missing something, you are not involved in BWE.
October 18, 2007 at 08:21 PM
First article: genius.
Second article: He's jealous.
October 19, 2007 at 04:25 AM
October 19, 2007 at 01:18 PM
did you insult 2nd interviewer's family at the beginning of the interview?
July 17, 2008 at 03:40 PM
The second interview actually made me laugh...at the interviewer. It is pretty obvious that the frustration the interviewer expressed stems from the fact that the he knows that Black's humor is "smart" but he just wasn't quite smart enough to get it. Poor guy, I feel bad for dumb people.
October 01, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I don't think the interviewer disliked Mike, I think he actually liked him and wanted to get some insight into what makes him tick. The contrast between how the two interviewers handle Mike's wiliness when it comes to personal questions is interesting. While Mike was funnier in the 1st article, the second article was better written and smarter. Of course, I have no clue how the interview actually went.
January 04, 2009 at 06:27 PM
I do not want to make any negative comments, because it was really nice
ugg sale |
December 04, 2010 at 10:11 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner